In the Name of ALLAH
                                           
             9 July           01 - 455 A.
     Zacarias Moussaoui  -v-     US.
          Muslim                 Godless gov..
     
     Why NOT CHARGE MY FATHER IN JIHAD ?
       AFRAID !
     
     Motion to put some SANITY in the SUPERLYING indictment
     
     ALLAH U AKBAR. US v UBL, that the name of the Zacarias
     Moussaoui indictment
     
     "Bin Laden and Al Qeeda violently opposed the US .."
     "Bin Laden declared JIHAD (holy war) against the US "
     "Bin Laden ... made effort to obtain ... nuclear weapon"
     "Usama Bin Laden ... fatwah ... Muslim should kill American"
     "Bin Laden ... the Nuclear Bomb of Islam ..."
     
     So if everything is Bin Laden (May ALLAH protect him) WHY
     NOT CHARGE HIM? Why not charge Usama Bin Laden and "Al
     Qeeda" for the actual attack of Sept 11 (not the
     conspiracy). IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE IT WILL GIVE ACCESS TO
     SECRET INTELLIGENCE MATERIAL ON UNDER COVER FBI SURVEILLANCE
     OPERATION TO DEFENDANT.
     
     Indeed more than 10 Month after the Sept 11 attack the FBI
     HAS NOT CHARGE ANYBODY IN THE WORLD FOR THE ACTUAL ATTACK OF
     SEPTEMBER 11 AND THE FBI WILL NEVER CHARGE AND BRING TO
     TRIAL ANY MEMBER OF AL QEEDA OR ELSE.
     
     The FBI CHARGE ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI WITH CONSPIRACY AND NOT
     THE ATTACK SO THE FBI DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE WHO DID THE
     ATTACK ORGANIZATION AND PLANNING. THUS THE FBI DO NOT HAVE
     TO GIVE EVIDENCE OF THEIR UNDER COVER SURVEILLANCE OPERATION
     AGAINST ME AND THE 19 BROTHERS SHAHID[NC] (ALLAH WILLING)
     
     Thus the FBI is prosecuting Zacarias Moussaoui with an
     UNPROVEN THEORY. THE FBI DO NOT WANT TO CHARGE THE LION OF
     ALLAH BECAUSE IT WILL PROVE THAT ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI WAS NOT
     IN 19 MARTYRS TEAM.
     
     CONSPIRACY, CONSPIRACY, did you say CONSPIRACY.
     
     Slave of ALLAH
     /s/ Zacarias Moussaoui
     
     ALLAH U AKBAR! WHO IS THE MAIN TIGER?
     
     [USAMA written upside down]
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     http://notablecases.vaed.uscourts.gov/1:01-cr-00455/docs/667
     23/0.pdf