The New York Times, January 6, 1997, p. D5. As the Web Expands, So Do Surveillance Tools By Matthew Hawn A few years ago, when the World Wide Web was new, the voyeuristic urges of Internet users had to be satisfied through the lenses of cheap digital cameras, set up to shoot grainy black-and-white pictures of mundane objects, updated every couple of minutes and transferred to a Web page. An early favorite was the coffeepot in the computer lab at Cambridge University (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/coffee/ coffee.html). Let's just say that the results weren't exactly Hitchcock's "Rear Window." Seen one coffeepot wired to the Net, you've seen them all. But Web voyeurism has evolved, and then some. Take McKinley's Magellan search engine, which recently added a feature to its site. Every 20 seconds, the Magellan Voyeur page (http://voyeur.mckinley.com/voyeur.cgi) gives a random sampling of keywords that other visitors to the site are requesting from the Magellan search engine. Click on these links and you can see the results of someone else's searches. Though it would be technically possible to identify many of the searchers by domain name and even E-mail address, Magellan Voyeur does not. Good thing for them, too. A few minutes here and it is obvious what is really driving Internet traffic these days: sex, Star Trek cosmology and the urge to search for one's own name. Thanks to the open nature of the Net, there is not much data that you cannot transform into a personal surveillance tool. This can be seen in full effect at Deja News (http://www.dejanews.com), a site that has catalogued and indexed more than 15,000 Usenet news groups -- the Internet's bulletin board -- since 1995. One feature of the site is a usage profile of each person who posts messages on Usenet. For instance, a search for Tim May, a highly regarded privacy and cryptography advocate, someone who might be expected to be serious about his privacy, shows that Mr. May has posted 527 messages to Usenet in the last year and a half. Deja News gives links to all of Mr. May's postings to 32 different news groups like the Cypherpunk mailing list, a beer news group and a fan group for Debbie Reynolds. No one ever said that Usenet was a private way to exchange information, but it can still be shocking to see one's own postings indexed and sorted by frequency and topic. When a reporter reached Mr. May (Deja News provided his phone number and E-mail address), he was less shocked than bemused. Posting to the Net is "essentially like ranting in a public park," he said, adding that people should get used to the idea that just about anyone (like potential employers) can browse these public archives for one's past postings. "It's really going to be hard to force people to unremember these public utterances," he said. "You just can't force people to take this information off their machines." Now before anyone gets too shocked and righteous about the fact that someone is watching and indexing Internet bulletin boards, it should be remembered that nothing on the Net is all that private. As the pulse of the Web flows through the network's veins, it is possible for just about every machine it passes through to record some of those vital signs -- an electrocardiogram of mouse clicks and keystrokes. Mostly, people rely on privacy by obscurity, hoping that the sheer volume of data that flows over the Net each day will keep browsing anonymous. But a lot of people have an interest in what others browse, and they see the information stored by Web site computers as pure gold. The current wisdom in Net economics is that most World Wide Web sites will pay for themselves by providing valuable demographic data that marketers can, and no doubt will, use to narrowly aim personalized advertising at consumers. While information enthusiasts look forward to customized Web services that tailor information to their personal interests, this can't happen without collected statistics on browsing habits. You might like to watch but are you ready to be watched? [End]