|
This file is available on a Cryptome DVD offered by Cryptome. Donate $25 for a DVD of the Cryptome 10-year archives of 35,000 files from June 1996 to June 2006 (~3.5 GB). Click Paypal or mail check/MO made out to John Young, 251 West 89th Street, New York, NY 10024. Archives include all files of cryptome.org, cryptome2.org, jya.com, cartome.org, eyeball-series.org and iraq-kill-maim.org. Cryptome offers with the Cryptome DVD an INSCOM DVD of about 18,000 pages of counter-intelligence dossiers declassified by the US Army Information and Security Command, dating from 1945 to 1985. No additional contribution required -- $25 for both. The DVDs will be sent anywhere worldwide without extra cost. | |||
6 December 1998. Thanks to Anonymous.
See other NSA declassification actions: http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/nsa/index.html
The Washington Post. The Fine Print, Sunday, 06 December 1998, Page W09
Keeping secrets is probably a good habit for a spy agency, but then it leads to e-mail like this, an internal memo from the National Security Agency announcing that it is okay to use the word "ZARF" -- without divulging what it means.
Steven Aftergood received this redacted memo through a Freedom of Information Act request (in other words, the NSA declassified a code word without telling anybody). Aftergood doesn't work for the NSA; he's director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists. He believes the agency took this step not to reflect the values of an open and democratic society, but to make it easier for non-ZARF-cleared people, such as secretaries, to push paper on which the word appeared. He also has a theory on the meaning of ZARF. He ran the word through the AltaVista search engine on the Web and got a lot of hits. Most of them were in Turkish -- a language in which "zarf" means "receptacle" or "envelope" -- but a few were Air Force references to a project on computer multi-tasking. His theory is that the NSA is researching ways to defeat other people's computer security systems -- "unless there are two government Project ZARFs."
The NSA declined to comment.
The Fine Print appears monthly. Contributions of authentic documents from readers are strongly encouraged. We seek memoranda, proposed pork, evidence of official or commercial hypocrisy, bizarre consumer caveats, etc. Send your plain brown envelopes to:
The Fine Print
The Washington Post Magazine
1150 15th St. NW
Washington, D.C. 20071