13 June 2000
Source: http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=00061201.clt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml


US Department of State
International Information Programs

Washington File
_________________________________

12 June 2000

FCC on Expanding Undersea Communications Cables

   (FCC plans to streamline authorization procedures)  (890)

   The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has moved to reduce
   bureaucratic restrictions on businesses that lay undersea
   communications cables.

   In a statement issued in Washington June 8, the FCC said its action is
   intended "to encourage rapid, facilities-based entry by multiple firms
   that can bring new capacity to keep up with increased demand."

   The growth of the Internet has triggered huge demand for submarine, or
   undersea, communications cable, the FCC said.

   The commission says whenever possible it follows a policy of promoting
   competition as a means to lower prices and improve services for
   consumers.

   Following is text as prepared for delivery:

   (begin text)

   Federal Communications Commission
   Washington, D.C.
   June 8, 2000

   FCC PROPOSES PRO-COMPETITIVE STREAMLINING MEASURE FOR LICENSING
   INTERNATIONAL SUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEMS

   The Commission today took major steps to streamline the submarine
   cable landing licensing process and promote competition in that
   market. The Commission adopted a proposal that would speed up the
   authorization process for many international submarine cable providers
   and enable these firms to compete more effectively in today's market
   -- a market that is at the core of the global information revolution.

   The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) adopted today recognizes the
   need to move with the swift pace of the market and to tailor FCC
   licensing processes to encourage rapid, facilities-based entry by
   multiple firms that can bring new capacity to keep up with increased
   demand.

   In recent years there has been an explosive growth in the number and
   capacity of submarine cables. This demand has been triggered by the
   demand for Internet backbone and data transmission. The proposals
   adopted today further streamline the Commission's licensing processes
   and promote competition in the Internet-driven submarine cable market.
   This streamlining measure follows upon the regime for International
   Section 214 authorizations in which the Commission has identified
   certain categories of applications that do not pose competitive risks
   and can therefore be processed quickly.

   In its 1999 Japan-U.S. Order, the Commission stated that it would
   commence a broader proceeding to examine how the Commission's policies
   regarding licensing submarine cables might best promote competition
   and benefit consumers. The Commission's International Bureau developed
   many of its recommended proposals to the Commission based upon
   recommendations made at a Public Forum held by the Bureau in November
   1999 and individual meetings with market participants and Bureau
   staff. The NPRM adopted today proposes streamlining measures to
   balance three key concerns: (1) the need for an expedited licensing
   process to speed the deployment of cable capacity to the market; (2)
   the need for careful Commission review of certain applications to
   guard against anticompetitive behavior; and (3) the need for the
   Commission to establish a model approach that could be used around the
   world.

   Background:

   Streamlining Options:

   The NPRM's streamlining proposal would provide both regulatory
   certainty and choice. Specifically, the NPRM proposes a mechanism
   under which an applicant for a submarine cable landing license can
   obtain expedited processing of its application.

   The NPRM proposes the following three options, any one of which would
   qualify an applicant for streamlined review:

   The first streamlining option is a demonstration that the route on
   which the proposed cable would operate is competitive. A route is
   "competitive" under the proposal when at least three independently
   controlled cables, including the proposed cable, serve the route.

   The second streamlining option is a demonstration that the proposed
   cable system will be controlled predominantly by new entrants. An
   applicant that is providing service on the route for the first time
   could satisfy this proposed streamlining criterion simply by
   certifying that the "key applicant group" of the proposed cable does
   not control any existing wet link capacity on the route to be served
   by the proposed cable. Alternatively, for a proposed cable whose "key
   applicant group" controls existing capacity on the route to be served
   by the proposed cable, the applicant could make a showing that it
   controls less than 50 percent of the existing wet link capacity on the
   route.

   The third streamlining option is a demonstration of pro-competitive
   arrangements regarding landing stations and competitive backhaul
   (transit between cable landing stations and the public network), as
   well as capacity upgrades and use of capacity.

   Failure to qualify for streamlining would not necessarily result in
   denial or delay of an application. It would simply mean that the
   application would be reviewed, without prejudice, on a non-streamlined
   basis.

   Other Issues:

   Although noting that cable landing licenses are conditioned on
   obtaining approval from the Secretary of State, the NPRM proposes
   that, if an application qualifies under one of the three streamlining
   options, the Commission will grant the application within 60 days.
   Separate from streamlining, the Notice also proposes to continue its
   private submarine cable policy in order to further stimulate
   competition in the market, but would not abandon the distinction
   between submarine cable systems which operate on a common carrier and
   a non-common carrier basis.

   It also seeks comment on the routine conditions imposed on submarine
   cable licensees. The Notice also proposes to provide clarity and
   regulatory relief by proposing a definition of "applicant" for a
   submarine cable landing license that exempts any owner of less than a
   5 percent interest (other than landing station owners).

   (end text)

   (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
   Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)